as wikipedia tells me:
"The Council of People's Commissars decided to form the Red Army on 28 January 1918."
Trotzkij was involved, and while im not sure how much credits he deserves, i am sure that even without him, the army would have been created.
"At the beginning of its existence, the Red Army functioned as a voluntary formation, without ranks or insignia. Democratic elections selected the officers."
Now this must have been an completely ideology-blinded idiot to create such an "army", believing it could do *anything* in real combat situation..
So sorry, my opinion of Trotzkij fails to improve..
(By the way, Trotzkij, who was for "peace and internalism", created the Red Army; No contradiction seen?)
Stalin on the other hand did what had to be done for his goals, including massive industrialization, incredible military innovations, '37, etc, understanding that the world would not become communist only thanks to propaganda.
And while what he did was horrible from an ethical point of view, it all made sense from a strategic one.
-
Working class revolution sounds so very communistic (it indeed is), but such a revolution failed in germany.
It only succeeded in russia. which, at this time, did not really have industry, and thus, no working proletariat.
If Trotzkij believed in a working class revolution, russia was the wrong country to be in..